Psychologists are employed in a wide array of professions that support human development and well-being. One of the key areas is education, where psychological frameworks guide interventions designed to promote student success. In my PSYC 498 class, I was introduced to the Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS), a preventative and proactive framework that combines data and education to optimize student outcomes. MTSS is a systematic approach that provides varying levels of support based on student needs, aiming to ensure success for all children. This approach involves three levels: Tier 1 provides universal classroom instruction for all students, Tier 2 involves small-group interventions for those who need additional support, and Tier 3 offers intensive, individualized help for students who require the most assistance. MTSS emphasizes four essential components: screening, progress monitoring, a multi-level preventative system, and data-driven decision-making.

 

​

While I was initially exposed to MTSS theory, I did not fully comprehend its practical significance until I participated in real-world school screenings. For the Early Supports for Student Success (ESSS) project, I assisted in administering school climate surveys in nine fifth- grade classrooms across two middle schools in Rock Hill, South Carolina. The aim was to identify students at risk for emotional or behavioral challenges, as nearly one in five children experience emotional or behavioral (EB) problems, with many not receiving the necessary mental health services. The survey data collected revealed critical insights into students’ psychosocial health, offering a chance to proactively identify students in need of support. This data collection, aligned with MTSS principles, helped inform the types of interventions students would receive. The collected data from the surveys was used to guide interventions at Tier 1 and Tier 2 of MTSS. At Tier 1, all students participated in the climate surveys, which provided an overall picture of the school's climate and students’ social and emotional health. This helped to identify students who might be at risk, offering a starting point for further assessment. Tier 2 interventions, such as the Interconnected Systems Framework-Enhanced (ISFE) for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and school mental health (SMH) services, were employed for students who required additional support. For example, students who scored lower on the climate surveys, indicating potential struggles with emotional or behavioral regulation, were targeted for small-group interventions focused on building social-emotional skills and offering additional mental health resources.

 

​

During this process, I directly observed how important it is to collect precise data, which guides decisions on appropriate interventions. I understood that without these screenings, students might not receive the appropriate level of support. For instance, students identified through the surveys as needing emotional support would be grouped into small sessions or referred for more targeted mental health services. These interventions, based on data-driven decision-making, helped ensure that students who were struggling academically, socially, or emotionally received the appropriate support based on the severity of their needs.

 

​

Another aspect of MTSS I witnessed in practice was its focus on Tier 1 and Tier 2 interventions being adaptable to each school’s available resources. For example, schools with greater resources were able to implement additional mental health support and offer more targeted small-group interventions, while schools with fewer resources relied on more fundamental interventions, such as behavioral support strategies in the classroom. This variation highlighted the importance of equitable resource distribution and the challenge of providing consistent support across different school environments. The most eye-opening part of my experience was seeing how MTSS's approach to social and emotional learning aligned with the way schools address both academic and emotional needs. By prioritizing early identification and intervention, MTSS supports the whole child, preparing students not only for academic success but also for personal growth and social-emotional well-being. I saw firsthand how a proactive support system, like MTSS, could make a significant difference in a student’s academic trajectory and overall well-being. This reinforced my understanding that educational psychology goes beyond theory—it is about practical application in real-world settings to create meaningful change in students' lives.

 

​

Ultimately, I came to realize that MTSS is more than just a framework. It is a system that requires constant data collection, monitoring, and adjustment to meet the diverse needs of students. Through my work with the ESSS project, I witnessed how the data collected through surveys directly impacted the interventions applied, helping schools deliver the right level of support at the right time. This experience reinforced my belief in the importance of equity in education, showing how systems like MTSS, when effectively implemented, can ensure that every student has access to the support they need to succeed, both academically and socially.